Be A Soldier In The Army Of The Lord

Service To Jesus Christ Is The Highest Calling

A Very Real New World Order by Chuck Baldwin

Posted by soldierservant on May 26, 2009

Chuck is really right on about this. He even mentions here that there is
no difference between Rush or Savage. Of course there will be neocon
hypocrites who will only blame democrats for being globalists. Just like
when I recently made a comment to my mom about the absurdity of the
global warming concept she said it was all Al Gore. How stupid can you
get? Anyone that believes that also believes he invented the internet.
No one man is responsible for the global warming lie like no one man is
responsible for globalism. It is all a collective effort from the wicked
elitists that run everything. The global warming lie is all a part of
the rise of globalism. They have managed to convince all of the fools
against their own senses. As I am writing this our roads are being iced
over in an icestorm. Anyone that believes the global warming nonsense is
dumber than a pile of bricks, to put it mildly. Just remember that Newt
Gingrich and Pat Robertson has joined Al Gore in the global warming lie
propaganda to all you hypocrites that want to just blame Al Gore. This
proves how full of it you all are. One of my christian industrial bands
has soundbites all through some of their songs of Bush Sr. talking about
New World Order. There was even a secular industrial band that used that
very title. I tell you, a lot of christian bands, and even some secular
bands, are like modern day prophets. They see all this crap for exactly
what it is. People have been warned for a long time now, whether by
music or by blog or other means, so there will be no excuse. Those who
cannot see the truth for what it is now will not be able to when the
Beast comes on the scene and demand his mark on all. If most all are so
deceived now when the Beast hasn’t come to full power then they will not
be able to fight his deception when he does rise to full power. Those
who are still sold on all the lies prove that they have no love for the
truth or any love at all. For those who fit that description may as well
go ahead and kiss your soul goodbye because you have no sanity or
conscience left to be convicted of anything. In other words, not able to
repent. Those who still look towards this world for answers prove their
idolatry and contempt for God. They do not trust Him nor do they belong
to Him. They are of their father the devil. But to all the outcasts and
all that are fed up with this world, you have hope in only Christ alone
and no other source. Keep your eyes on him and do not conform to this
wicked world.

This column is archived at
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090127.html

It is hard to believe, but a majority of Americans (including Christians and
conservatives) seem oblivious to the fact that there is a very real, very
legitimate New World Order (NWO) unfolding. In the face of overwhelming
evidence, most Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality, they
seem unwilling to even remotely entertain the notion.

On one hand, it is understandable that so many Americans would be ignorant
of the emerging New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses to
report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even "conservative" commentators and
talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, or Joe
Scarborough refuse to discuss it. And when listeners call these respective
programs, these "conservative" hosts usually resort to insulting the caller
as being some kind of "conspiracy kook." One host even railed that if anyone
questions the government line on 9/11, we should "lock them up and throw
away the key." So much for freedom of speech!

This is an area–perhaps the central area–where liberals and conservatives
agree: they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who believes that
global government (in any form) is evolving. One has to wonder how otherwise
intelligent and thoughtful people can be so brain dead when it comes to this
issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling their strings, doesn’t it?

The list of notable personalities who have openly referenced or called for
some kind of global government or New World Order is extremely lengthy. Are
all these people "kooks" or "conspiracy nuts"? Why would world
leaders–including presidents, secretaries of state, and high government
officials; including the media, financial, and political elite–constantly
refer to something that doesn’t exist? Why would they write about, talk
about, or openly promote a New World Order, if there is no such thing?

Many of us recall President George Herbert Walker Bush talking much about an
emerging New World Order. For example, in 1989, Bush told the students of
Texas A&M University, "Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a
family of nations."

Later, Bush, Sr. said, "We have before us the opportunity to forge for
ourselves and for future generations a new world order . . .. When we are
successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order,
an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to
fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders."

Bush, Sr. also said, "What is at stake is more than one small country, it is
a big idea–a new world order."

Bush, Sr. further said, "The world can therefore seize the opportunity to
fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order . . ."

What was President G.H.W. Bush talking about, if there is no such thing as
an emerging New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he
hallucinating?

England’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said, "We are all internationalists
now, whether we like it or not." He continued saying, "On the eve of a new
Millennium we are now in a new world. We need new rules for international
co-operation and new ways of organizing our international institutions." He
also said, "Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably
greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international
community."

In 1999, Tony Blair said, "Globalization has transformed our economies and
our working practices. But globalism is not just economic. It is also a
political and security phenomenon."

What is Tony Blair talking about, if there is no emerging New World Order?
What does he mean by "a new doctrine of international community"? What does
he mean by "new world"? How can one have globalism, which includes "a
political and security phenomenon," without creating a New World Order? Is
Tony Blair hallucinating?

Likewise, former President George W. Bush penned his signature to the
Declaration of Quebec back on April 22, 2001, in which he gave a "commitment
to hemispheric integration and national and collective responsibility for
improving the economic well-being and security of our people."

By "our people," Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the
people of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly reminded us that G.W.
Bush "pledged that the United States will ‘build a hemispheric family on the
basis of a more just and democratic international order.’"

Remember, too, that it was G.W. Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United
States to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is nothing
more than a precursor to the North American Community or Union, as outlined
in CFR member Robert Pastor’s manual, "Toward a North American Community."

If there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order, what was G.W. Bush
talking about when he referred to "a hemispheric family" and an
"international order"?

The public statements of notable world leaders regarding an emerging New
World Order are copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman,
Walter Cronkite.

In his book, "A Reporter’s Life," Walter Cronkite said, "A system of world
order–preferably a system of world government–is mandatory. The proud
nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and their own
survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . ." Cronkite told BBC
newsman Tim Sebastian, "I think we are realizing that we are going to have
to have an international rule of law." He added, "We need not only an
executive to make international law, but we need the military forces to
enforce that law." Cronkite also said, "American people are going to begin
to realize that perhaps they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to
an international body to enforce world law."

If there is no emerging New World Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking
about? Can there be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global
government? Absolutely not!

Now, when Bush, Sr. talks about fulfilling "the promise and vision of the
U.N.’s founders," he was talking about the same thing former UN
Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he said, "The
time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed."

The United Nations has been on the forefront of promoting the New World
Order agenda since its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual
entitled, "Our Global Neighborhood." It states, "Population, consumption,
technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex
relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global neighborhood.
Their effective and equitable management calls for a systematic, long-term,
global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development, which
has been the central lesson from the mounting ecological dangers of recent
times. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global
governance."

If there is no emerging New World Order, what is "global governance" all
about?

"Who are the movers and shakers promoting global government?" you ask.
Obviously, it is the international bankers who are the heavyweights behind
the push for global government. Remember, one cannot create a "global
economy" without a global government to manage, oversee, and control it.

In a letter written to Colonel E. Mandell House, President Franklin D.
Roosevelt said, "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a
financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S.
since the days of Andrew Jackson."

"Old Hickory" did his best to rid the United States from the death grip that
the international bankers were beginning to exert on this country. He may
have been the last President to actually oppose the bankers. In discussing
the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, Jackson said,
"Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced
that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of
the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you
lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits
from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families.
That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on,
you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a
den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God,
I will rout you out."

Unfortunately, the international bankers proved themselves to be too
formidable for President Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration of
President Woodrow Wilson, the bankers were given charge over America’s
financial system by the creation of the Federal Reserve.

Ever since the CFR and Trilateral Commission were created, they have filled
the key leadership positions of government, big media, and of course, the
Federal Reserve.

In his book, "With No Apologies," former Republican Presidential nominee
Barry Goldwater wrote, "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the
vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking
interests by seizing control of the political government of the United
States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort
to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power– political,
monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission
intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political
governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the
system, they will rule the future." Was Goldwater a prophet or what?

And again, the goals of the global elite have been publicly stated. Back in
1991, the founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major media for
their complicity in helping to facilitate the globalist agenda by saying,
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine
and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . . It
would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we
had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the
world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world
government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world
bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in
past centuries."

How could Rockefeller be any plainer? He acknowledged the willful assistance
of the major media in helping to keep the elitists’ agenda of global
government from the American people. To this day, the major media has not
deviated from that collaboration. And this includes the aforementioned
"conservative" talking heads. They know if they want to keep their jobs,
they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO, more than anything else,
is the "Third Rail" to the national media.

Is it any wonder that President Barack Obama has stacked his government with
numerous members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet Napolitano,
Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle. Other CFR members include
CFR President Richard Haass, CFR Director Richard Holbrooke, and founding
member of the Trilateral Commission and CFR member Paul Volcker. Obama even
asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to deliver the inaugural prayer.

Still not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what he
thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish,
former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, "I think his task will be
develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New
World Order can be created. It’s a great opportunity; it isn’t just a
crisis."

This is the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991,
"Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to
restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if
they were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, whether
real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all
peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one
thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario,
individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their
well-being granted to them by the World Government."

Even Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial
Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world government. In
his column he said, "I have never believed that there is a secret United
Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in my life,
I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.

"A ‘world government’ would involve much more than co-operation between
nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a
body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government
for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a
currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability
to deploy military force.

"So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking
that it might."

Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government
is plausible.

Do you now see why it does not matter to a tinker’s dam whether it is a
Republican or Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? For the most
part, both major parties in Washington, D.C., have been under the dominating
influence of the international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, the
CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also why it does not matter
whether one calls himself conservative or liberal. For the most part, both
conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., are facilitating the
emerging New World Order. It is time we wake up to this reality.

Presidents Bush, Sr., Bill Clinton, and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the
table for the implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in the
east. All Obama has to do is put the food on the table–and you can count on
this: Barack Obama will serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot
believe!

That a New World Order is emerging is not in question. The only question is,
What will freedom-loving Americans do about it? Of course, the first thing
they have to do is admit that an emerging New World Order exists! Until
conservatives, Christians, pastors, constitutionalists, and others who care
about a sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the reality of an
emerging New World Order, they will be incapable of opposing it. And right
now, that is exactly what they are not doing.

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these
editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by
credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:

http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php

(c) Chuck Baldwin

NOTE TO THE READER:

This email editorial cannot be considered Spam as long as the sender
includes contact information and a method of removal.

To subscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/subscribe.php

To unsubscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/unsubscribe.php

Chuck Baldwin’s commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished,
reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does not
charge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied intact
and that full credit is given and that Chuck’s web site address is included.

Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions or
advertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin for
permission. Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling an
interview with Chuck should contact chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com

Readers may also respond to this column via snail mail. The postal address
is P.O. Box 37070, Pensacola, Florida. When responding, please include your
name, city and state. And, unless otherwise requested, all respondents will
be added to the Chuck Wagon address list.

Please visit Chuck’s web site at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: