Be A Soldier In The Army Of The Lord

Service To Jesus Christ Is The Highest Calling

Pro-Life Candidates Should Put Up Or Shut Up

Posted by soldierservant on December 11, 2007

This column is archived at
chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2007/cbarchive_20071130.html

To subscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
chuckbaldwinlive.com/subscribe.php

Please consider this scenario. Several youngsters are drowning in a
neighborhood lake. They are thrashing the water and crying out for
help. There is a large, heavy raft nearby that could be used to rescue
the drowning youths, but it would take several people to haul it into
the water and then row it out to the victims.

Now, as it happens, there are more than enough people standing around
the lake whose combined efforts would be more than adequate to rescue
the drowning young people. Instead of grabbing the life raft and
heading out to save the victims, however, they all start making
speeches.

One by one, the would-be rescuers holler out that they believe in
life; they believe in saving the lives of the drowning young people.
They are all “pro-life.” The only problem is, none of them grabs the
raft and actually attempts to save the victims. So, here is the
sixty-four million dollar question: are these people really
“pro-life”? Do they really want to save the victims, or are they
simply pro-life pretenders who only want to talk about saving lives
but not actually do anything about it?

There is no one reading this column who would accept the pro-life
rhetoric of the people around the lake as justification for not
grabbing the life raft and actually saving the lives of those who were
drowning. Then, why do “pro-life” conservatives accept the rhetoric of
Republican politicians when there is no action to back it up?

If Mitt Romney, John McCain, Fred Thompson, and Mike Huckabee are
truly “pro-life,” they need to do more than just talk. They need to
put up or shut up!

Ladies and gentlemen, it doesn’t take some magical Supreme Court
appointment to overturn Roe v. Wade and end abortion-on-demand. If all
the Republicans who keep telling us that they are “pro-life”
(including President George W. Bush) were really pro-life, then why,
in spite of having had ample time and opportunity to end the abortion
holocaust, have they not done so?

In fact, the GOP has controlled the U.S. Supreme Court since the
infamous Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion-on-demand was
handed down in 1973. That means GOP appointments have dominated the
Court for over thirty years, and yet abortion-on-demand is still the
law of the land.

Beyond that, for six years (2000-2006), “pro-life” Republicans
controlled the entire federal government. And, for six years, millions
of unborn babies cried their silent screams as the abortionists’
scalpels ripped their little bodies apart in abortuaries throughout
America. And to use my opening analogy, all these “pro-life”
Republicans did was stand by the side of the lake and talk “pro-life,”
while the youngsters drowned in front of their eyes. During all this
time, the life raft sat unused on the shore.

Dear reader, the life raft for the millions of unborn babies
victimized by abortion-on-demand is the U.S. Constitution. However, we
have a bunch of arrogant and conceited imbeciles in Washington, D.C.,
who have neither the smarts nor guts to use this wonderful life raft.
It seems that the vast majority of them have absolutely no knowledge
of the Constitution–even though each and every one of them takes an
oath to preserve, protect, and defend it.

The only presidential candidate who has a commitment to saving the
lives of unborn babies and who understands the constitutional
authority of Congress to end abortion-on-demand is Texas Congressman
Ron Paul (with the exception of Alan Keyes, who recently announced his
candidacy). You read it right. At this point, John McCain is all talk;
Mitt Romney is all talk; Fred Thompson is all talk. And even Mike
Huckabee is all talk.

Huckabee says that when he was Governor of Arkansas he required
parental notification for abortions, required a woman give informed
consent before having an abortion, and required a woman be told that
her baby would experience pain and be given the option of anesthesia
for her baby. (Source: Mike Huckabee’s website) While this is
commendable, none of Huckabee’s actions did anything to actually end
abortion-on-demand.

When it comes to ending abortion-on-demand and overturning Roe v.
Wade, the only thing Mike Huckabee (and the rest of the Republican
presidential candidates, save Ron Paul and Alan Keyes) will say is
that they will appoint the right judges, as if they have no power as
President to do anything else. (Good grief! Even Rudy Giuliani says as
much.) My friends, these “pro-life” Republicans are either woefully
ignorant themselves or they are pulling the proverbial wool over our
eyes.

Ron Paul seems to be the only presidential candidate who understands
that under Article. III. Section. 2., the Constitution gives to the
Congress of the United States the power to hold rogue courts in check
and to overturn outlandish rulings such as Roe v. Wade.

Accordingly, Ron Paul has introduced and reintroduced the Sanctity of
Life Act (including in the current Congress). If passed, this Bill
would recognize the personhood of all unborn babies by declaring that
“human life shall be deemed to exist from conception.” The Bill also
recognizes the authority of each State to protect the lives of unborn
children. In addition, this Bill would remove abortion from the
jurisdiction of the Court, thereby nullifying the Roe v. Wade
decision. The Bill would also deny funding for abortion providers. In
plain language, the Bill would overturn Roe v. Wade and end
abortion-on-demand.

Is it not more than interesting that “pro-life” President George W.
Bush, along with the “pro-life” Republican Party leadership of both
houses of Congress, refused–and continues to refuse–to support Ron
Paul’s Sanctity of Life Act? In addition, not a single “pro-life”
presidential candidate outside of Ron Paul has even bothered to
mention the Sanctity of Life Act, much less aggressively call for its
implementation with a promise that, if elected President, he would
sign it into law. Not Huckabee; not McCain; not Thompson; not Romney;
none of them!

Why did John McCain not introduce Dr. Paul’s Sanctity of Life bill in
the U.S. Senate? Why have Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, and Fred
Thompson not committed to use the power of the bully pulpit of the
White House to push Congress to implement this Act? Again, either
these men are ignorant of their constitutional duties and
responsibilities (in which case, they are unqualified for the office
of President) or they are not truly serious about overturning Roe v.
Wade and ending abortion-on-demand (in which case, they are
conservative phonies and frauds).

I say again, it is time for “pro-life” Republicans to put up or shut
up!

Beyond that, it is time for Christian conservatives to stop being so
gullible. We need to start looking beyond eloquent rhetoric and
campaign clichés. We need to begin demanding results.

Every four years, Republicans trot out a conservative façade during an
election season for the purpose of obtaining the votes of susceptible
Christians. And every four years, conservative Christians–like
starving catfish–take the bait: hook, line, and sinker.

“Save us from the monster,” seems to be the cry of well-meaning–but
easily manipulated–conservatives. The “monster” is whoever the
Democrats nominate, of course. But, ladies and gentlemen, the
Republican Party has done absolutely nothing to change the course of
the country. Nothing! In fact, it has only gotten worse with
Republicans in charge.

Ron Paul is the only candidate running against the status quo. He is
the only candidate who takes his oath to the Constitution seriously.
He is the only candidate who, if elected, would actually turn the
country around. A Ron Paul victory would launch a new American
revolution: a revolution of freedom and independence such as we have
not seen since 1776. Furthermore, among the major Republican
presidential contenders, Ron Paul is the only candidate whose pro-life
commitment extends beyond rhetoric.

(c) Chuck Baldwin chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com

PS. One further note regarding Mike Huckabee. He will not win the GOP
nomination, but what he will do is wind up endorsing (or perhaps even
being selected as the Vice Presidential candidate) whichever
Republican candidate wins the nomination–even if he is a pro-abortion
candidate. Thus, he will fulfill his role in this election: to bring
Christian conservatives into the Republican fold, even without a
commitment to the life issue by their standard-bearer. In other words,
Huckabee is the establishment’s guy to make sure that the Christian
conservatives stay “in line.”

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
%d bloggers like this: