Be A Soldier In The Army Of The Lord

Service To Jesus Christ Is The Highest Calling

Archive for June 10th, 2007

Top Military Chiefs Being Replaced

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

Even the conservative military is turning against Bush now.

Posted in America, George Bush, Iraq | Comments Off on Top Military Chiefs Being Replaced

General Peter Pace Being Replaced

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

I just read about this recently. The cowards in the government are not
even saying why he is being replaced but I know the real reason. It was
him that spoke out and said that homosexuality is immoral and
unnatural. Unfortunately he caved into the pressure and renounced that
statement. You see,even trying to appease them does no good. This is no
surprise coming from an administration that is pushing the homosexual
agenda.This needs to be brought out on the blogs in addition to the BUSH
SCORECARD. There is constant proof of this ongoing corruption.Yes there
are smokescreens and diversions where Bush pretends to be against it
just like he pretends to be against abortion.Hypocrites
said that he has stopped the gruesome procedure of partial birth
abortion,as if regular abortion is not gruesome and murderous.There is
no hope for the likes of those that condone such genocide of the
unborn.If 911 happened due to God’s judgment on abortion then more
judgment awaits us since abortion hasn’t even tapered off since then and
worse than 911 has to be coming.It is not a matter of if but when.Even
politics aside I discuss the fallen nature of the church and
many totally deny it.This is totally hypocritical too because many say
that they are praying for revival.If everything was alright with the
church then why do they need to pray that?People constantly contradict
themselves.They will have much to answer for because they know

It is an ongoing search to find a legitimate and fruitful ministry that doesn’t
compromise the truth. I guess maybe Chuck Baldwin is as good as it
gets,even though I don’t see eye to eye on everything but he seems to be
one of the sharpest and most perceptive to the truth.

Posted in abortion, America, Christianity, church corruption, George Bush, GOP, homosexuality, idolatry, illegal immigration, politics, prophecy, Republican | Comments Off on General Peter Pace Being Replaced to Fight the New World Order: Because There’s a War on for Your Mind

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

American Dictators: Documenting the Staged Election of 2004

BBC Reporter Greg Palast: “Alex Jones is a national treasure, a light breaking through the electronic Berlin Wall of the US media establishment.

American Dictators is a 90+ minute expose chronicling the degeneration of America’s political process. Alex Jones rips away layer after layer of the false left-right paradigm and finally reveals the 2004 election for what it is — stage managed theater that would make Shakespeare proud.

American Dictators details:

  • That Bush and Kerry are closely related on both sides of their families,
  • That Bush the Skull and Kerry the Bone have both sworn an oath to a secret society with deep connections to organized crime, intelligence agencies, and the occult.
  • That the “Order of Death” known as Skull and Bones has its members at the highest levels of every sector of the US economy — from banking to government.

Jones travels back to the elite encampment in Northern California, the Bohemian Grove where he infiltrated and got the only video footage of the bizarre rituals conducted by the bushes and others.

American Dictators shows that while Bush and Kerry spout different rhetoric their actions are almost identical. The film also takes a revealing look at Ralph Nader, the dark horse would-be political spoiler of ’04.

Alex Jones takes you to the front lines of the fight against the expanding Police State: the new Super-Patriot Act and National ID Card, as well as some of the newest and most shocking revelations surrounding the September 11th cover-up.

American Dictators is a must-see for anyone who wants to know the truth concerning how the global elite has hijacked both parties and is giving the American people a false choice. By exposing this rigged game where the global mob owns all the horses, American Dictators is able to unlock minds so then freedom loving individuals can decipher the mainstream media propaganda for what it is: a Military-Industrial complex operation.

“Long after the election of 2004 is over, American Dictators will be just as pertinent to current events as when we first released it, because it exposes the fraudulent system itself – a system that continues to repeat the same tricks over and over again. American Dictators exposes the scam.” — Alex Jones

Posted in America, fascism, George Bush, media, mental illness, politics, prophecy, spiritual deception | Comments Off on to Fight the New World Order: Because There’s a War on for Your Mind


Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

Resources to aid your Understanding


Subtitle: Acting out of Christian concern, and bearing in mind Jesus’ warning to examine a person’s spiritual fruits, CWA is suddenly alarmed that Bush is aggressively pursuing the same radical homosexual agenda as did Clinton.

The New World Order is coming! Are you ready? Once you understand what this New World Order really is, and how it is being gradually implemented, you will be able to see it progressing in your daily news!!

Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!

Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.



NEWS BRIEF: “Bush Leaves in Place Clinton ‘Domestic Partners’ Policy At State, Gay Paper Reports’, Concerned Women of America, April 18, 2002,

“The Bush administration is leaving in place a policy enacted in the last days of the Clinton presidency that calls for supporting the ‘unmarried partners’ of U.S. Foreign Service workers, according to a homosexual newspaper. The Washington Blade reports in its current (April 12) edition that a State Department spokesman ‘involved in personnel matters said Colin Powell, Bush’s secretary of state, and other high-level officials appointed by Bush,’ reviewed the pro-homosexual directive by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright ‘and decided to keep it in place’.”

We Born Again Christians supported George W. Bush for President in the elections of 2000 because we desperately wanted a clear change from the disastrous moral policies of Bill Clinton. We were tired of Clinton’s sexual dalliances, but we were equally tired of his constant support of homosexual policies! Clinton did more to advance the cause of the Gay/Lesbian agenda than any previous president in history.

We wanted a huge change, and most Christians thought we had it in George W. Bush, who claimed to have been Born Again through the ministry of Billy Graham. In the interim period from December 13, 2000, when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bush in the Florida election controversy to January 20, 2001, when he took office, Bush intimated that he would do much to roll back the Clinton policies. He ordered a temporary freeze on the many and controversial Executive Orders Clinton initiated just before leaving office, and he hinted he would do the same type of review throughout the Executive Branch.

Just a few weeks into his presidency, Bush officials quietly announced that they would not roll back any of Clinton’s Executive Orders, but would allow them to stand and assume the full force of law. We should have realized then and there that Bush might not have any intention of reversing any of the Gay/Lesbian policies of the Clinton years, but most Christians still were too enamored of Bush to really notice.

Let us stop right here to review the Illuminist viewpoint of the average citizen in the world, written over 100 years ago in a New World Order planning document entitled, “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion“. Listen carefully, for their understanding of human nature will explain most of the reason Clinton stayed so very popular, and why Bush is staying popular with Christians even though his “spiritual fruits” are contrary to those of a genuine Christian. The spiritual fruit is starting to be very noticeable on the Bush Presidency Tree. Listen:

“In all ages the people of the world, equally with individuals, have accepted words for deeds, for THEY ARE CONTENT WITH A SHOW and rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance.” [Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Subparagraph #8, Protocol #5, Despotism and Modern Progress. [Emphasis was in the original]

Christians are even more gullible than this sentence implies when it comes to spotting a counterfeit, look-alike Christian. We want to believe; therefore, we ignore the accumulating evidence to the contrary. We listen to the snippets of words and actions that confirm our belief and ignore those that conflict. Thus, we remain immersed in darkness, and are deceived.

Let us now return to this article from Concerned Women of America [CWA]:

“The Blade reports that the Clinton/Albright — and now Bush/Powell — policy directly benefits, among others, Michael Guest, the openly homosexual career Foreign Service officer who Bush appointed last year as Ambassador to Romania. Guest’s homosexual lover lives with him in the U.S. Embassy compound in Bucharest and has accompanied him, like a spouse, to ‘official embassy functions, including a U.S. Marine Corps ball,’ according to the newspaper.” [Ibid.]

How many Christians are even aware that Bush had nominated an openly gay person as Ambassador to Romania? How many Christians are aware of this spectacle in Romania, where this gay ambassador is accompanied by his male lover to “official embassy functions, including a U.S. Marine Corps ball” as though they were married? This scene is straight out of Sodom and Gomorrah, for homosexual relationships were so out in the open, and so accepted there, that no laws existed that forbade such open display of gay activity.

Now, CWA tells us how Clinton/Bush are openly pursuing this gay policy in such a manner as to circumvent the law:

” ‘I think the State Department can do what Vermont did with ‘civil unions,’ a Republican source on Capitol Hill told Culture & Family Report. ‘They can’t say Fred is the spouse of Paul, but they can go a long way toward giving Fred all the benefits of a spouse.’ (Vermont’s ‘civil unions’ law grants all the benefits of marriage to homosexuals without the word ‘marriage.’)”

Michael Schwartz, Vice President for Government Relations for Concerned Women of America agrees.

“It appears as if the Clinton State Department changed the words to circumvent DOMA,” Schwartz said. “They’ve done an end-run around the law, and it’s surprising to see the new [Bush] administration going along.”

Let us consider another CWA article, this one even more serious:

NEWS BRIEF: “Pro-Homosexual ‘Hate Crimes’ Promotion Continues under Bush Administration”, by Peter LaBarbara, January 10, 2002,

“Washington, D.C. — The Departments of Justice and Education are distributing publications that advance a homosexual ‘hate crimes’ agenda identical to that of former president Bill Clinton — almost a year into the administration of George W. Bush, C&F Report has learned … Instead of turning the spigot off, it seems the Bush administration is letting the same water pour out full blast,” said McCoy, president of the West Virginia Family Foundation (WVFF).” [Emphasis added]

“But McCoy is starting to question the administration’s intentions. He cites the continued availability of another tendentious [biased] document on the Department of Education’s (DOE) Web site, titled “Protecting Students from Harassment and Hate Crime: A Guide for Schools,’ which was published by the DOE’s Office of Civil Rights and the National Association of Attorneys General. The 157-page report lists dozens of pro-homosexual organizations, many from Massachusetts, as resources …”

Thus, we can see that President Bush is continuing to threaten the liberties of Christian Americans to speak out Biblical truth about homosexuality. When Clinton pushed for “tolerance” and “diversity” in the homosexual vein, we understood that, one day, Christians might be jailed and persecuted simply and only for daring to publicly proclaim the Biblical truth about the matter.

This area is one very critical example of the changes we expected a Christian Bush to undertake. Lamentably, he has not changed this pro-gay policy, but continues to enforce it within his Administration!

Another conservative leader is then quoted in this CWA article as he expresses disbelief that Bush is continuing to enforce this Clinton policy that endangers the sexual welfare of our children. Listen:

“Brian Camenker, president of the Massachusetts-based Parents Rights Coalition, was surprised to learn that the Clinton education document citing homosexual activist groups as resources is still available a year into President Bush’s administration. ‘From a parent’s point of view, a report like this from our federal government is unbelievably offensive,’ Camenker told C&F Report. ‘Every one of these groups has been active in our community pushing the radical homosexual agenda in the public schools which my children attend. The Bush administration should be protecting us, not aiding predators of our children‘.” [Emphasis added]

This particular fruit of the Bush Administration is especially foul: “aiding predators of our children” is strong stuff indeed. If you or I were in Bush’s shoes, we would have taken action on the first day in office to reverse this particularly offensive agenda; but, Bush has not, continuing to enforce these Clinton policies.

Now, let us look at yet another CWA article, as CWA examines what homosexual activists are saying about Bush.

NEWS BRIEF: “Homosexual Activists Pleasantly Surprised by Bush Record”, by Peter LaBarbara, January 23, 2002,

“A year into the administration of George W. Bush, homosexual activists are praising the Republican president for supporting their agenda more than they had expected. Bush’s appointment of former Montana Governor Mark Racicot (R) as chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC) is the latest action to earn applause from ‘gay’ leaders. A lobbyist with the homosexual pressure group Human Rights Campaign (HRC) hailed Racicot’s pro-homosexual record and said his ‘appointment is a message of inclusiveness and tolerance in the Republican Party’.”

We encourage you to go regularly to the Gay Republican Log Cabin web site at to see just how enthusiastic they are about Bush’s avid pro-gay agenda. In fact, to really receive eye-opening news, subscribe to Log Cabin Republican’s electronic newsletter. Your eyes will truly be opened.

In the middle of this article, quoted above, CWA then reports that Log Cabin is truly gloating over the pro-gay agenda of Bush. Listen:

Log Cabin Gloats: The Log Cabin Republicans (LCR) are busy gloating over Bush’s homosexual-affirming record. This includes a recent appointment of an open homosexual as ambassador to Romania, and Bush’s lack of a support for a conservative effort to maintain a congressional ban on the District of Columbia’s ‘domestic partner’ law, which gives marriage-type benefits to unmarried and homosexual city employees.

“ ‘Remember how every other gay organization was predicting disaster for the nation and the beginning of an ‘extremist’ anti-gay era?” LCR stated in its January 2002 newsletter, according to the Blade. “What a difference a year has made.”

“We’re proud to report that one year later, President George W. Bush has governed exactly the way he promised he would,” the newsletter reportedly states. “He won LCR’s endorsement on the promise to be an inclusive Republican president and to lead a new, more inclusive Republican Party. And our president has come through in his first year. Promise made, promise kept.”

As if this Gay outpouring of support for Bush were not bad enough, CWA then lists the homosexual agenda being followed by the Bush Administration.

Bush Homosexual Record Outlined: Although homosexual activists traditionally aligned with the Democratic Party have a lot of bad things to say about President Bush’s record on ‘gay’ issues, particularly his nomination of the socially conservative Ashcroft as Attorney General, the Blade article is striking in its positive tone examining Bush’s first year.

The Blade reported the following developments under Bush:

* He did not overturn Clinton’s pro-homosexual executive orders;
* He made “four openly gay appointments, including a gay ambassador [Michael Guest] who moved into the U.S. Embassy compound in Bucharest, Romania, with his same-sex partner”;
* He signed the federal appropriations bill that ended the 10-year ban on D.C.’s “domestic partner” program;
* His administration has allowed homosexual couples to apply for “victim compensation” from the September 11 terrorist attack;
* He continued the policies of the Clinton administration on AIDS, including not opposing an increase in federal AIDS-related spending. (The Blade quotes a homosexual AIDS activist: “To many of us, that’s OK, because some people feared they [the Bush administration] would pull back from what we have now.”)
* He has appointed ‘a number of top officials who have long-standing records’ supporting ‘gay civil rights’, such as Mary Matalin as White House counselor. Matalin is a GOP campaign strategist who has repeatedly derided pro-family opponents of homosexual activism (one time referring to them as ‘the Leviticus crowd’ after the Old Testament book in which God calls homosexual acts an abomination).”

I find it highly objectionable that President Bush would nominate someone like Mary Matalin, who was so derisive in calling us Fundamental Christians the “Leviticus crowd”, thus simultaneously also deriding our precious Bible.

Concerned Women of America even noted how Attorney General Ashcroft is cooperating with the Gay/Lesbian agenda.

NEWS BRIEF: “Ashcroft Decision on ‘Hate Crime’ Case Seen as ‘Fuel’ for Kennedy Bill”, by Robert H. Knight, May 2, 2002,

“Homosexual activists say they are planning to use Attorney General John Ashcroft’s announcement on April 10 that federal prosecutors would include a “hate crime” component in a 1996 double murder to lobby for a hate crimes bill sponsored by Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts). According to the May 14 edition of The Advocate, a magazine for homosexuals, Human Rights Campaign Political Director Winnie Stachelberg “said that HRC would use Ashcroft’s decision as fuel in its lobbying efforts for the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act, a sweeping federal bill that would stiffen penalties for crimes based on sexual orientation, gender, and disability — all of which are currently absent from federal hate-crimes law.”

A CWA spokesperson asks: ““The Hate Crimes Sentencing Enhancement Act is not necessary to charge the death penalty for this crime,” said Jan LaRue, chief counsel for Concerned Women for America. “In fact, this is probably the first time this law has ever been used. We have to ask, is the attorney general claiming that the government could not seek the death penalty had the victims been a husband and wife?” [Ibid.]

In other words, CWA is saying that Ashcroft is cooperating with the gays to pass a law that sets special protection for gay couples that are not afforded straight couples! Predictably, the gays were very pleased with Ashcroft.

“Pleasantly surprised by Mr. Ashcroft’s action, The Advocate article commented, ‘The attorney general’s passion is particularly interesting because as a Republican U.S. Senator, Ashcroft was a vociferous opponent of hate crimes legislation that included sexual orientation’. CWA then lamented the “sweeping powers” this legislation affords;

“Kennedy’s bill would extend federal jurisdiction to “sexual orientation” and the other categories and apply it widely to crimes committed anywhere, not just on federal property. ‘They say this is a ‘sweeping’ bill, and they’re right,’ LaRue said. ‘It would constitute a major expansion of federal prosecutorial power’. Current federal law 18 USC Section 1111 would clearly allow the Justice Department to seek the death penalty in this case, LaRue said, so ‘Mr. Ashcroft did not need any ‘hate crime’ component’.”

Thus, we see that Gay Republicans are pleased with Ashcroft , at least on this issue. However, Log Cabin Republicans (LCR) reported that Ashcroft made a point of making his first meeting with a civil rights group after assuming office to be with a gay group. Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: “ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCROFT MEETS WITH LOG CABIN. First Meeting with Civil Rights Organization, New Attorney General Reaches Out to All Americans”, February 22, 2002.

“(WASHINGTON) In his first meeting with a civil rights organization, Attorney General John Ashcroft met today with the leadership of Log Cabin Republicans, the nation’s largest gay Republican organization, at his office in the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. ‘This meeting was another step in solidifying a working relationship with the Attorney General and the Department of Justice on civil rights issues and matters of concern to gay and lesbian Americans’, said Rich Tafel, executive director of Log Cabin Republicans, who attended the meeting.”

However, proving he is very conscious of his public perception, Bush did announce he would no longer proclaim Gay/Lesbian Pride Day. This proclamation is exceedingly hollow in light of Bush’s real actions, as noted above. However, the average Christian is paying no attention to Bush’s actions, but will certainly hear his announcement that he is no longer proclaiming gay pride day! What was it the Protocols had to say again?

“”In all ages the people of the world, equally with individuals, have accepted words for deeds, for THEY ARE CONTENT WITH A SHOW and rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance.”

CWA is so concerned about President Bush’s pro-homosexual agenda they have posted a great cartoon on their web site at


Even the secular world is noticing the huge, huge disparity between Bush’s anti-homosexual campaign promises and his real-world activities since taking office as president. Listen to Baldwin’s bold lament over Bush’s pro-gay policies.

NEWS BRIEF: “Bush in Bed with Homosexuals”, By Chuck Baldwin, April 23, 2002.

“”By now, we have a clear record on the Bush administration in regard to homosexuality. The record reveals that President Bush is more than sympathetic to the homosexual agenda. One could even argue that Bush has become (or always was) a proud promoter of that agenda. Here is the record; you judge for yourself.”

“1. Candidate George W. Bush appointed four openly homosexual, gay-rights advocates to his presidential campaign steering committee. According to the homosexual group, Log Cabin Republicans, ‘scores’ of Bush state steering
committee members and campaign volunteers were homosexuals.

2. Perhaps this explains why hundreds of homosexuals gathered in Washington, DC, last weekend to ‘celebrate the achievements and leadership of George W. Bush.’ It also helps to explain why Rich Tafel, executive director of
Log Cabin Republicans, said, ‘We want the country to know that we are behind our president and administration.’

3. On Dec. 21, 2001, President Bush signed a historic bill, which ‘for the first time allows the District of Columbia government to fund a program that will give domestic partners of city employees access to health benefits.’ Remember, Bush insisted that openly homosexual Congressman Jim Kolbe of Arizona be given a prominent speaking role at the Republican National Convention. It was Kolbe who introduced the amendment lifting the ban on gay partner benefits in DC

4. Bush named Scot Evertz, a prominent homosexual activist, to head the White House AIDS office even though he had absolutely no experience dealing with public health issues.

5. Bush appointed another homosexual activist, Donald Cappoccia, to the U.S. Commission on Fine Arts.

6. Bush appointed openly homosexual, Michael Guest, as Ambassador to Romania. Since then, Bush has decided to leave in place a Clinton policy that calls for supporting the ‘unmarried partners’ of U.S. Foreign Service workers. This allows Guest’s live-in lover to live in the U.S. Embassy in Bucharest and allows him to join Guest at official embassy functions.

7. Bush presided over the appointment of homosexual activist, Stephen Herbits, to oversee the choice of civilian personnel at the Pentagon.

8. Bush has not reversed a single pro-homosexual policy instituted by former president Bill Clinton. Not even one!

9. The Bush administration posted a job for what is called a ‘gay and lesbian program specialist’ at the Department of Agriculture.

10. Bush appointed the ardently pro-homosexual Governor of Massachusetts, Paul Cellucci, as U.S. Ambassador to Canada.

11. Bush appointed Lewis Eisenberg to become the new GOP chief fundraiser. Eisenberg has a long history of supporting pro-homosexual and pro-abortion candidates.

12. Just yesterday, The Washington Times reported, “The Bush administration has joined European delegates to an upcoming U.N. Summit on children in moving to recognize families ‘in various forms,’ including unmarried cohabiting couples and homosexual partners.’ ”

[Reprinted with permission]


“Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” [Matthew 7:16-20; Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary]

Interestingly, this section is preceded by verse 15, in which Jesus warns of spiritual deception by counterfeit sheep.

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” [Ibid.]

Is this the situation we have here? Is George W. Bush a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”? Are the fruits of his administration consistent with the good fruits of the Bible? Are these fruits consistent with a Born Again believer who has the Holy Spirit residing within? Are these actions what Jesus would do? (W.W.J.D?)

Also interestingly, Jesus’ comments about knowing a person by their fruits [verses 16-20] is followed by verses 21-23, where Jesus meets such bad-fruit people who were sheep in wolves’ clothing, on the White Throne Judgment. These people are being condemned to the Lake of Fire and do not understand why. They did so many mighty works for Jesus, even casting out demons! Yet, the Lord said to them: “I never knew you; depart from Me, you who act wickedly, disregarding My commands.” [Matthew 7:20-21; Parallel Bible, KJV/Amplified Bible Commentary].

At this point, many well-meaning Christians will say to me that we are not to “judge”, even on the basis of fruits. They say this because of Jesus’ condemnation of hypocritical condemnation. In Matthew 7:1, Jesus says, “Do not judge and criticize and condemn others, so that you may not be judged and criticized and condemned yourselves.”

Jesus then goes on to describe hypocrites who do unjustly judge and criticize others for things they are doing in their own lives. We see these examples in verses 3, 4, and 5. In verse 5, Jesus even calls such a person a “hypocrite”. Therefore, a person guilty of the same or worse behavior is not to be piously criticizing another person.

But, this section does not tell us we can never “judge” the fruits of another person. In fact, Jesus also said, “Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.” [John 7:24] We are to judge, but do so “righteously”. We are not to judge by merely superficial examination, but we are to get well under the surface before we reach a “righteous decision” on a person’s fruit!

I really like the way the Amplified Bible Commentary reveals the full meaning in the original language:

“Be honest in your judgment and do not decide at a glance (superficially) and by appearances; but judge fairly and righteously.”

The political advisers of both Clinton and Bush have actually turned Jesus’ admonition around 180º! Bush is publicly posing as a good Christian who really has Jesus’ commandments in his heart, when his record speaks otherwise. Bush and his advisers know well that the majority of Christians will examine him superficially according to his public pronouncements and some well-placed media stories, thus superficially judging him to be Christian. He knows full well that the average Christian does not take the time to dig well beneath the surface to discover the true spiritual fruit.

We thank Chuck Baldwin and Concerned Women of America for getting below the surface. May we all recognize the true spiritual fruits of this president; we believe they have “judged righteously”.Truly, we are getting close to the End of the Age.

Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.

If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.

If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.

We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order — Kingdom of Antichrist — in their daily news.

Finally, we would love to hear from you.

You can contact us by mail or email.

God bless you.

Subscribe to our email updates and messages from our editor by entering your email address belowReturn to:


Karl Rove Seen at Homosexual Orgies in Washington

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

 Walter Storch, editor of the Barnes Review News reported three weeks ago that “Karl Rove was seen by one of my people entering a private homosexual orgy at a five-star Washington hotel over the Mid-Atlantic Leather (MAL) weekend last year.” [2004]

A Barnes reporter told Storch that “Karl greatly enjoyed the supervision of a certain hairy 350-lb. Leather Dominator who had won the Miss Virginia Daddy Bear title at the MAL festivities.”

Storch wrote, “Karl used to hang out a JR’s, which is on 17th between P & S streets, before he became so well-known. This is a respectable gay bar for discreet people…,” adding, “there is an expensive apartment…over near Dupont Circle that certain powerful senators take turns visiting with their pickups.”

“Bush, via Karl Rove, was projected as a moral man who would return a hedonistic America to the simpler virtues of a bygone era. A large part of the American public, unhappy with what they saw as debilitating liberalism, abortion on demand, gay marriage and other forms of moral decay, put Bush back in office,” said the Barnes editor.


Gay Media Whore Matt Drudge Losing Readership

Media Whore Bill O’Reilly Cuts US Colonel’s Mic

Matt Sanchez:Like Jeff Gannon?

Posted in George Bush, GOP, homosexuality, media, politics, Republican | Comments Off on Karl Rove Seen at Homosexual Orgies in Washington

Bush And The Homosexual Agenda: White House Misleads Public on Baby-Cheney Photo Caption

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

George Bush, the most pro – homosexual President in history, and it isn’t close.

We erred in blaming the liberal media (USA Today) for the caption describing the photo (above) of Dick and Lynne Cheney and their new grandson, Samuel David, born to self-identified lesbian Mary Cheney.

It turns out that the caption — identifying both Mary Cheney and her lesbian partner Heather Poe as Samuel David’s “parents” — was the official work of the White House, a point eagerly seized upon by homosexual blogger John Aravosis. In the link below, Aravosis exults in the White House photo as proof of President Bush’s official embrace of “gay” parenting. Of course, the Cheneys’ grandson does not have two lesbian “parents” but one — Mary Cheney, whose lesbian partner, Heather Poe, only creates an artificial, fatherless “family.”

And what was Aravosis thinking when he wrote the the Bush administration “prides itself on being so anti-gay”? This is a White House that refused to defend Gen. Pace when he voiced his belief that homosexual acts are “immoral”; that refused to overturn a single Clinton administration Executive Order mandating “sexual orientation” policies in the federal government; and that has disappointed pro-family conservatives in its lackluster promotion of a Federal Marriage Amendment (despite the fact that Mr. Bush practically owes his re-election to that issue).

The misleading White House photo caption is only the latest disappointment. If only the Administration DID “pride itself” on taking principled stances to slow down and reverse the homosexual agenda!

Click HERE to read ex-gay Stephen Bennett’s take on the White House Cheneys-and-grandson caption. The following is the excerpt of Aravosis’ blog entry:

John Aravosis Is : White House officially recognizes legal status of gay couples and parents

Link: AMERICAblog, by John Aravosis

Something rather historic happened this past week. The White House, for the first time every on its Web site (that I know of), recognized the legitimacy of gay couples as both married and as parents. It was done, innocuously enough, when the White House published a photo of Vice President Dick Cheney’s new grandson, the child of the VP’s lesbian daughter and her lesbian spouse. The White House not only published a photo of the child with the VP and his wife, but the caption was even more telling:

Vice President Dick Cheney and his wife, Lynne Cheney, welcomed their sixth grandchild, Samuel David Cheney, Wednesday, May 23, 2007. He weighed 8 lbs., 6 oz and was born at 9:46 a.m. at Sibley Hospital in Washington, D.C. His parents are the Cheneys’ daughter Mary, and her partner, Heather Poe. White House photo by David Bohrer

Did you catch that last sentence? The White House officially recognized a lesbian couple as co-equal parents of a child. That not only is a recognition of the legitimacy of gay parents – i.e., if one person is the birth mother and the other the mother’s partner, both are the parents of the child, per the White House — but the White House is also, implicitly, recognizing the legitimate couple status of two gay people in love, i.e., they are not simply two unrelated gay people, they are parents, akin to your parents, akin to a married couple. Why do I say that the White House is de facto recognizing gay marriage? Because either Mary or her lover, or both, are not the biological mom of this child – with two women, only one can be the biological parent. For the White House to recognize both as parents means that they are recognizing the legitimacy of the two women as one entity, the parent. Anyway, it’s a hell of a statement by any White House, let alone one of the most conservative in history, and one that prides itself on being so anti-gay.

Send Article to a Friend

Posted in George Bush, GOP, homosexuality, Republican | Comments Off on Bush And The Homosexual Agenda: White House Misleads Public on Baby-Cheney Photo Caption

Bush Actions Advance Homosexual Agenda

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

From: Ken Connor, President To: Friends of Family Research Council

President Bush has shown inspirational leadership in the aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. He has united and rallied the country, and he is forging an international alliance against the scourge of terrorism. While the nation’s attention understandably is focused on the war against terrorism and the effects of the dastardly attacks, pro-family advocates must remain alert to a disturbing trend we have identified in the Bush administration.

We’re all familiar with celebrity product endorsements. Having Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan or Cal Ripken Jr. endorse a product is enormously powerful. President Bush’s implicit endorsement of the homosexual political agenda is having the same effect. The president’s actions, tantamount to an endorsement, are imparting legitimacy to the homosexual political cause.

Yesterday, for example, I reported how for the first time Congress voted to allow publicly funded homosexual partner benefits in the District of Columbia. Why was the nine-year ban on DC gay partner benefits lifted? We lost this vote because 41 Republicans bolted to join 184 Democrats. Doubtless some of these GOP defectors took a cue from the White House, which has been sending clear signals that the administration has embraced significant portions of the homosexual agenda. Consider Mr. Bush’s record on the issue:

* As a candidate, Mr. Bush met with the Log Cabin Republicans, a group of homosexual activists. Two of the six activists he met with have since been given high-level jobs in the administration.

* The Bush campaign insisted that openly homosexual Congressman Jim Kolbe of Arizona be given a prominent speaking role at the Republican National Convention. It was Rep. Kolbe who introduced the amendment lifting the ban on gay partner benefits in DC despite a bipartisan agreement that such controversial measures would not be introduced while the nation was still reeling from the September 11 terrorist attacks.

* President Bush named former Massachusetts Gov. Paul Cellucci, a militant advocate of homosexual rights, as U.S. ambassador to Canada. For years, pro-family advocates in Massachusetts fought to block Gov. Cellucci’s promotion of the homosexual agenda in the state’s public schools.

* President Bush named Scott Evertz, a prominent gay activist, to head the White House AIDS Office. Mr. Evertz, who has almost no experience dealing with public health issues, was one of the Log Cabin Republicans who met with Mr. Bush during the campaign.

* In August, another of the activists who attended that meeting, Donald A. Cappoccia, was appointed to the U.S. Commission on Fine Arts, which among other things has authority over monuments and memorials in Washington.

* And just a week ago, Secretary of State Colin Powell swore in as U.S. Ambassador to Romania openly homosexual foreign service officer Michael Guest. Secretary Powell recognized Mr. Guest’s “partner” of six years, Alex Nevarez, who was on stage for the ceremony and who reportedly will live with the ambassador in the official U.S. residence in Bucharest. (Is this the Bush administration’s idea of promoting family values abroad?) A spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, a homosexual lobbying group, said, “It is heartwarming to hear the secretary acknowledge [Mr. Guest’s] entire family, including his partner. That small gesture spoke volumes.”

Indeed, such actions do speak volumes. While the president’s rhetoric and proclamations about the importance of family are welcomed, and we have praised him for them, his actions in this area speak at least as loudly as his words. There seems to be a disturbing disconnection between Mr. Bush’s rhetoric on behalf of the family and the reality of the agenda occurring under his administration. Rhetoric is a poor substitute for action.

The administration’s promotion of the homosexual agenda is part of a political strategy being run out of the White House chiefly by Mary Matalin, wife of Democrat strategist James Carville, and a founder of the pro-homosexual Republican Unity Coalition. Activists such as Ms. Matalin worked behind the scenes at the Republican Convention to remove the strong pro-family planks from the GOP platform. Only the vigilance and hard work of FRC and other pro-family organizations in Philadelphia stopped the “big tent” advocates from using the GOP platform as a vehicle for advancing the radical homosexual agenda.

The cumulative effect of these presidential actions, like a sports superstar endorsing a breakfast cereal, have enormous influence. Giving the government’s stamp of approval to “gay partners” undermines the unique character of marriage and makes it progressively harder to hold the line against demands that we extend legal recognition to same-sex unions as the equivalent of marriage. The homosexual lobby understands this perfectly. Pro-family advocates need to be no less politically savvy.

We urge President Bush to reconsider his embrace of this destructive, anti-family political strategy, and reject the advice of those advisers who would undermine marriage and family for the sake of illusory political benefits.

Back to Chuck’s “The Bush Record” page
Back to Home Page

Posted in church corruption, George Bush, GOP, homosexuality, politics, Republican, spiritual deception | Comments Off on Bush Actions Advance Homosexual Agenda

Religious Right Decries Republican Gay-Straight Alliance

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

Sure, they “decry” it, but they go and support these people anyway rather than form their own party. Why? Power!

Religious Right decries Republican gay-straight alliance
Religious Right groups attacked a Republican gay-straight alliance, which was launched at a January 2001 pre-inaugural breakfast welcoming President-elect George W. Bush to the nation’s capital. The Republican Unity Coalition was formed to foster greater tolerance and diversity in the Republican Party.

“Our mission is to make sexual orientation a nonissue in the Republican Party,” said Republican Unity Coalition co-founder Brian O’Leary Bennett, once chief of staff to former U.S. Rep. Robert K. Dornan. Another founder, Charles Frances, had arranged an earlier meeting between then-candidate George W. Bush and the so-called “Austin 12,” a group of gay Republican activists.

“I don’t know of a single policy that can be passed in the White House that could be more damaging than for the leader of the free world to embrace organizations and people who are promoting [a homosexual] agenda,” Joe Glover, director of the Family Policy Network claimed. Glover claimed that the “Republicans who are seeking unity are actually giving tacit endorsement of this lifestyle.”

Glover, along with the Americans For Truth Project and Focus on the Family, urged social conservatives to express concern over the Bush Administration’s “openness toward the homosexual agenda.” Glover and Peter LaBarbera, of the Americans For Truth Project, said that calls, letters, and e-mails to the White House and lawmakers would “go a long way in slowing a new ‘gay-friendly’ GOP.”

In August, four leaders of the Republican Unity Coalition issued a declaration of principles calling on the Republican Party to embrace the principles of diversity and tolerance. The so-called “Cody Statement” was named after the Wyoming town where it was drafted. Cody is also home to Coalition member Alan Simpson, a former U.S. Senator.

“We believe in freedom,” the statement reads. “We believe everyone should be included in America’s proud progression toward full civil equality for all, without regard to sexual orientation.”

Robert H. Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute, said the statement was full of “many contradictions and moral confusion,” and an “insult to the citizens of Cody.”

Both the Culture and Family Institute (CFI) and the Family Research Council issued reports suggesting a Bush administration endorsement of a so-called “homosexual political agenda.” The Family Research Council claimed that the administration’s “promotion of the homosexual agenda is part of a political strategy being run out of the White House chiefly by Mary Matalin … a founder of the pro-homosexual Republican Unity Coalition.”

“God does not approve of Republican homosexuality any more than Democratic homosexuality,” warned CFI’s Knight. The Institute’s “The Bush Administration’s Republican Homosexual Agenda” report branded Matalin a “Bush confidant with significant pro-homosexual credentials.” [HC2001]

Posted in George Bush, GOP, homosexuality, Republican | Comments Off on Religious Right Decries Republican Gay-Straight Alliance

Why Christians Should Not Support George W. Bush

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007
Why Christians Should Not Vote for George W. Bush
by Dr. Patrick Johnston
15 February 2004Crucifix

George W. Bush professes to be a Christian, goes to church, makes references to Bible verses, and says, “God bless America,” but so did Bill Clinton, so this alone cannot be sufficient to win our vote.

The Roman emperor Nero didn’t mind Romans calling themselves Christians.  He didn’t throw them to the lions or burn them at the stake because they believed in Jesus.  He just wanted them to worship Caesar too.  They were allowed to add Jesus to their list of Roman gods.  Even today in Communist China, Christians are not beaten, tortured, and imprisoned in labor camps because they believe in Jesus or profess to be Christians.  Not at all.  They’re persecuted because they act like Christians.  They’re beaten and thrown in prison because they evangelize, because they deny the heresies of the government-sanctioned church, because they speak against tyrannical government usurpations such as the denial of God-given rights, because they refuse to render unto Caesar that which is due only to God. Not every person who professes to be a Christian is one.  Faith without works, without tangible deeds of obedience, is dead faith – it is the faith of devils. (James 2:10-24)  Jesus asks, “Why do you call me Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?” (Luke 6:46)  “Ye shall know them by their fruits.  Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.  A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.  Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire.  Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” (Matthew 7:16-20)George W. Bush professes to be a Christian, goes to church, makes references to Bible verses, and says, “God bless America,” but so did Bill Clinton, so this alone cannot be sufficient to win our vote.  Like Clinton, George Bush’s fruit was evident to all with eyes to see during his campaign against Gore.  Many Christians were undoubtedly innocently ignorant of George W. Bush’s liberal tendencies and so easily susceptible to his conservative rhetoric, but far too many were willfully blind to his bad fruit.  Pragmatism took precedence over God’s Word and the principles of conservatism when conservatives the nation over supported and voted for the most electable candidate over the only blessable, anointable candidate, and as you will see in the course of this article, the roots of tyranny have deepened in America as a result.  The guilt for the daily encroachment on God-given rights to life, liberty, and property, under President Bush’s leadership, can be laid squarely at the foot of the professing church.  If there was ever any doubt about the liberal sway of George W. Bush before his Presidency, that doubt should be well cleared up by now for all but only the willfully naïve.

Do I believe that sincere, well-meaning Christians can vote for George Bush and be right with God?  Sure!  I believe that a sincere, well-meaning Christian can vote for Howard Dean and be right with God!  Having an IQ greater than a slug is not necessary in order to be a Christian.  Unintended ignorance can destroy a nation, however, and God’s people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge. (Hosea 6:4)  It is intentional, willful, or malicious ignorance in the absence of the fear of God that brings culpability (Proverbs 9), and of this I fear many professing Christians are guilty in their endorsement of George Bush in spite of the abundance of evidence of his bad fruit.

What is this “evil fruit” to which I refer?  Precisely what is it about George W. Bush that I believe should preclude sincere Christians from voting for him?

I. George W. Bush on Abortion

On the campaign trail, President Bush professed to be “pro-life,” but with exceptions – he believes abortion to be justified in cases of rape and incest.1,2  The New York Times reported, “It was the same tempered language that George W. Bush typically uses to discuss abortion, which he opposes except in cases of rape, incest or risk to a pregnant woman’s life.”3  As Alan Keyes pointed out in the Presidential debates and in various speeches, such pro-life exceptions that allow the innocent to be killed in some circumstances disqualify President Bush from being pro-life at all.4 If President Bush would justify the killing of one innocent person under his jurisdiction, he is disqualified from being a good person, much less a good leader.  Having a rapist for a dad is not a capital crime, and for President Bush to state that innocent children can justly be killed because of the tragic circumstances of their conception reveals that he doesn’t comprehend the basic principle of the inalienable, inviolable, God-given right to life acknowledged in our nation’s founding documents.Also, on the campaign trail, George Bush and his wife both admitted that they don’t think Roe v. Wade should be overturned: “I don’t think the culture has changed to the extent that the American people or the Congress would totally ban abortions,” President Bush professed.5   His wife reiterated her husband’s sentiments on a prime-time television interview on January 18, 2001.  G. W. Bush has the power as the President of the United States to overturn this legal child-killing,6 but refuses to exercise this power, and so is responsible for all the child-killing he is allowing.During the Presidential debates, President Bush was asked what he would say to a raped and pregnant family member.  He said that he would tell her that the decision whether or not to kill the child was up to her.  That is not pro-life.  That’s classic pro-abortion rhetoric.  If his daughter wanted to kill her grandmother to get the inheritance early, would he counsel her: “Sweetie, if you want to kill my mom, that’s completely up to you!?”  Commenting on abortion on the campaign trail, President Bush stated, “good people can disagree on that issue.”7  Oh really?  This is manifestly absurd.  Can good people disagree on whether or not innocent people should be murdered?  I beg to differ: Good people cannot accept the murder of one single innocent human being.Many conservatives have tried to overlook President Bush’s liberal tendencies in hopes that at the least G. W. Bush will appoint a pro-lifer to the Supreme Court, and in so doing, help overturn Roe v. Wade.  Their hope is not only without evidence, it is plainly contrary to evidence.  In his prime-time television debates with Gore, George Bush flatly denied that he had a pro-life litmus test for Court appointees.8  If a judicial candidate deemed it just and constitutional to execute innocent people, that did not exclude him from a possible appointment to the Supreme Court according to President Bush.  President Bush has insisted that he will only appoint “strict constructionists” to the Court, or people who will interpret and apply the Constitution as the founders intended and not as an evolving, “living document,” but according to President Bush they need not be pro-life ‘strict constructionists.’  His record as Governor of Texas shows that he does indeed appoint pro-abortion judges, so we should not be surprised if President Bush were to appoint pro-abortion judges to the Supreme Court.Frequently displayed as evidence of President Bush’s pro-life views is his signing of legislation when he was Texas’ Governor that forbade underage girls from getting abortions without parental consent.  The pro-life community roared their approval: a 13-year-old girl can’t get an aspirin without parental consent, why should she be allowed to undergo a surgical or chemical abortion without parental consent?!  That’s sound pro-life legislation, right?  George Bush must be pro-life, huh?  Wrong!  Did you realize that this piece of legislation was nullified by a Texas Supreme Court decision that ruled 6-3 that an unexceptional 17-year-old could get an abortion without telling her parents?

9  The New York Times reported, “It was, after all, appointees of Gov. George W. Bush who took the lead on the issue…”  You see, it was G.W. Bush who appointed four of the court’s nine justices and has been a political patron for a fifth, Harriet O’Neill, who wrote the majority opinion in the parental notification case.  If this is what President Bush means by “strict constructionists,” then any hope that he will appoint a pro-lifer to the Federal bench is baseless.Also displayed as evidence that President Bush is pro-life was his reinstitution of Reagan’s Mexico City policy in the first days of his Presidency, which forbade taxpayer dollars from being given to organizations that perform abortions overseas.10  However, the pro-life façade soon came down.  In a major policy shift, President Bush has decided to allow social service agencies in Africa and the Caribbean to receive funds from the U.S. treasury under his $15 billion emergency AIDS relief plan even if they promote family planning and provide abortions.11, 12 The New York Times confirmed, “Ignoring objections from his conservative base, President Bush is to make a Rose Garden speech on Tuesday in support of a $15 billion bill to fight A.I.D.S. internationally that will direct some money to groups that promote abortion,” and that will do very little to actually prevent AIDS.13  Conservative groups also hold forth President Bush’s support of the “Partial Birth Abortion Ban” as evidence that he is indeed pro-life.  Really?  Does that make Tom Daschle pro-life, since he supports the Ban too?  Don’t be so gullible, friend.  The Partial Birth Abortion Ban won’t save a single life!14 Not one!  Millions of rare pro-life dollars and countless hours of precious pro-life energy has been wasted over the course of a decade on a bill that won’t save a single life!   The same babies that would perish through the “Dilation and Extraction Procedure” will die through arguably more painful “procedures” such as the “Dilation and Evacuation Procedure,” where instead of being instantly killed with a stab to the head, the baby will be slowly ripped limb from limb.  Furthermore, the very language of the ban encourages the killing of the baby before extraction.  If an abortionist injects poison into the full-term baby’s heart, for instance, and then performs the “D & X Procedure,” then the Ban would not apply.15   Thoughtful pro-lifers should oppose this counterfeit pro-life bill, this colossal waste of paper that perpetuates the Abortion Holocaust.Thanks to G.W. Bush’s leadership, companies such as Planned Parenthood, the largest baby-killing conglomerate in the world, will get taxpayer funding.  Planned Parenthood was responsible for the deaths of 227,385 Americans in 2002 alone.  Planned Parenthood’s 2002-2003 Annual Report shows that 33 % of its income came from federal government grants and contracts totaling $254.4 million in the fiscal year ending in June 2003, thanks to Medicaid disbursements and President Bush’s Title X of the Public Health Service Act in 2001.  Under Bush, this baby-killing organization has received more tax-funds than under Clinton!  Thanks in large part due to government handouts under President Bush, Planned Parenthood raked in a hefty $36.6 million profit in its last fiscal year.16  It is no exaggeration to say that President Bush kills babies.  He uses his influence and power to perpetuate the Abortion Holocaust.  Abortion abolitionists need to look beyond the Republican Party to find friends for the preborn.  Those of us who supported George W. Bush and elected him to office may be responsible for the bloodshed that he perpetuated, either by way of our willful ignorance or our intentional refusal to judge righteous judgment, to judge President Bush by its fruit.II. George W. Bush on Sodomy

Conservatives all over the nation are significantly frightened right now about the prospects of Federally mandated “gay marriages.”  The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled this summer that their state constitution does not forbid gays from getting married, and they gave the legislature six months to change the marriage laws to accommodate sodomites who want to marry.  If the legislature capitulates and grants homosexuals the right to marry, they will get married in Massachusetts and return to their home states to sue to have their marriages accepted.  Thanks to a popular interpretation of the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, those suits may be successful and if they are, the social and financial benefits states grant to marriage will be minimized and the covenant of marriage in America will be crippled.  Under the present judicial tyranny that regularly defies the will of the people and spurns the Constitution, the fear of family advocacy groups is legitimate.

Similarly, conservatives fear the judicial activism that is forcing a new religion down our throats, namely, atheistic humanism.  We have Federal judges like U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson ruling that Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore has no right to acknowledge God on the job.  Conservatives are in an uproar about the judicial tyranny that would cause a democratically-elected, upright man such as Roy Moore, who was only following his state Constitution’s precedent in acknowledging God, to be evicted from the state bench. 

Where do these bench-legislating, cultural-marxist judges come from?

They come from Presidents like G.W. Bush!  And they are rubber-stamped to the bench by the so-called conservative Republicans in the Senate.  Let’s judge this President Bush by his fruit. 

In an interview with Diane Sawyer on gay unions, President Bush said, “The position of this administration is that whatever legal arrangements people want to make, they’re allowed to make, so long as it’s embraced by the state or at the state level.”17   In other words, if state Supreme Court judges want “civil unions” like the Vermont statute, that state should be allowed to have it.18   We should not be surprised by the judicial tyranny that threatens to force gay marriages, “gay civil unions,” and a new state religion, atheistic humanism, upon us – we have supported and voted for men such as President Bush who appointed these pro-abortion, pro-homosexual judicial activists.  The same family advocacy groups that condemn statements of President Bush like this that undermine traditional marriage supported him in 2000 and will probably support him in 2004.  President Bush has stated that he has no qualms about hiring homosexuals,20 and he has proven it.  He has appointed open homosexuals to high government positions at a rate that makes Bill Clinton look like a homophobe!21  In December of 1999, when President Bush was Governor of Texas, he appointed a supporter of the Houston Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus and also of Planned Parenthood, Martha Hill Jamison, to the 164th District Court in Houston.  Very early in his tenure as President, G.W. Bush appointed a pro-homosexual, pro-abortion candidate to the Federal bench.22  Early in 2000, President Bush attempted to purge the Republican platform of planks against homosexual marriage and homosexuals in the military.  On April 9, 2001, he appointed a renown homosexual activist, Scott Evertz, to the Office of National AIDS Policy, which was the first appointment of an open homosexual to this federal position.23  On June 18, 2002, he transferred Evertz to direct U.S. Policy on Global Fund for AIDS and appointed another homosexual activist to take over as new director of the Office of National AIDS Policy.24On September 18, 2001, President Bush appointed a homosexual activist to be Ambassador to Romania at the protest of the Romanian government.  Furthermore, President Bush authorized a Clinton policy that allows an “unmarried partner” of a foreign aid worker to be given the same status as a married spouse.  So the ambassador’s homosexual lover accompanies him to official government functions, travels with and resides with him on the taxpayers’ tab.  On August 22, 2001, President Bush appointed an open homosexual to the U.S. Commission on Fine Arts.25  He presided over the appointment of another open homosexual to oversee the choice of civilian personnel at the Pentagon.26   The Bush administration posted a job for a “gay and lesbian program specialist” at the Department of Agriculture.  On November 1, 2001, President Bush appointed an open homosexual to the State Department as an arms control advisor, which was the first appointment of an openly gay person to a senior arms control post.  President Bush insisted that openly homosexual Congressman Jim Kolbe of Arizona be given a prominent speaking role at the Republican National Convention.27, 28  On January 25, 2002, President Bush appointed many openly gay Republicans to the President’s Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS.29  G.W. Bush hired running mate Dick Cheney’s openly gay daughter to be a consultant for him during his campaign.  “The governor believes Mr. Cheney has a wonderful family,” a Bush spokesman said. “Being gay or lesbian is not a liability in this campaign.  The governor embraces both of Mr. Cheney’s daughters and will invite them to campaign with him.”30   Dick Cheney openly promotes “same-sex unions.”31On Dec. 21, 2001, President Bush and the Republican Congress passed historic legislation extending family health benefits to Washington, D.C., employee’s “partners” and also gave unfettered adoption rights to D.C. homosexual couples.  He refused to nullify a 1998 Clinton executive order prohibiting discrimination against homosexuals in the federal workforce.  He signed a bill allowing death benefits to be paid to the “domestic partners” of firefighters and police officers who die in the line of duty.

32  This was the first time that a federal death benefit was granted to same-sex couples.  He has increased funding for homosexual propaganda campaigns under the guise of health education programs.  He allowed the Office of Personnel Management, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Justice, to openly celebrate “gay pride.”33   On April 18, 2002, at the annual meeting of the Log Cabin Republicans, the White House hosted a first-ever policy briefing for gay Republicans, featuring senior administration advisors.34  On June 24, 2002, President Bush signed the Father Mychal Judge Act, in honor of the openly gay fire department chaplain who died at the World Trade Center on 9-11.  This act allows public safety officers killed in the line of duty to assign federal benefits to designated beneficiaries, including same-sex partners.35   It is the first such federal law which allows such benefits to be granted.President Bush publicly praised the Metropolian Community Church of Los Angeles on occasion of its 35th anniversary, a church that performs 6,000 “gay marriages” annually.36   In his letter of congratulations, President Bush said, “By encouraging the celebration of faith and sharing of God’s love and boundless mercy, churches like yours put hope in people’s hearts and a sense of purpose in their lives.  This milestone provides an opportunity to reflect on your years of service and to rejoice in God’s faithfulness to your congregation.”George Bush joined a horde of homosexual activists in maligning and mischaracterizing a Christian man, Jerry Thacker, he had appointed to the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS.  Mr. Thacker’s wife acquired the disease from a blood transfusion during delivery, and when she and her infant son succumbed to the disease, Jerry Thacker, now HIV positive, devoted himself to ministering the transforming love of God to those dying of AIDS.  He offered forgiveness and redemption to homosexuals through the grace of Jesus Christ and reparative counseling.  Presidential spokesman Ari Fleischer said of Thacker, “The views that he holds are far, far removed from what the president believes.”37   Thacker withdrew from the appointment after President Bush and the homosexual smear machine began to denigrate and verbally assault him for his beliefs.George Bush’s home church in Texas is Highland Park United Methodist Church in Dallas.38 This church welcomes impenitent homosexuals as members.  President Bush said he reads the Bible daily, but he confessed to the New York Times, “I don’t necessarily believe every single word is literally true.” About the evolution-creation debate, he said, “The verdict is still out on how God created the earth. I don’t use the Bible as necessarily a way to predict the findings of science.”  In other words, Darwinism may be true according to President Bush.  When the Bible and a scientific consensus are at odds, whom do you think that George Bush believes?The church has largely neglected its Biblical duty to judge a tree by its fruit, to “judge righteous judgment.”

39   George W. Bush is a counterfeit conservative.  If judicial activists pervert the covenant of marriage to accommodate the homosexual lobby, it will be because of politicians like George Bush who appoint them.  The majority of the Supreme Court justices who handed legalized child-killing down to us, who outlawed Bible reading and prayer in schools, and who refused to hear Roy Moore’s appeal were appointed by Republican “Christians” who got in office with the support of the conservative Christians in America.  The blame for the assault on the traditional family and the preborn can be laid squarely at our feet because of our negligence in preferring pragmatism over principle, political power over persecution, and religious pluralism over Christ.  The Supreme Court has forsaken God ultimately because the professing church has forsaken God.  Thousands of “the least of these” are murdered every day in America because the majority of professing Christians voted for it or failed to vote against it.  The only truly pro-life, pro-family, constitutional candidate for President who was on the ballot in 2000 was the Constitution Party’s candidate, but that vote would have required a faith that works. III. George W. Bush on Other Issues

There are many other reasons Christians should conscientiously object to voting for George W. Bush.  Certainly, many of these acts are not necessarily sinful, but together they provide convincing proof that George W. Bush is not an authentic conservative.
*   He demoralized Korean and Japanese Christians by bowing down at a pagan Shinto shrine in Japan.40
*   His public profession that Muslims and Christians worship the same God, contrary to the plain teaching of Scripture.
41, 42 
*    His endorsement of Ramadan, a Muslim fast, at a White House celebration.
*    His proposal to increase funding of the National Endowment for the Arts by 15 percent, the highest percentage increase in two decades.  That’s a total of 139 million dollars in 2005 to finance art, much of which is blasphemous.  (Recall the taxpayer-financed painting of a crucifix in a jar of urine.)
*    His support of increased Federal involvement in the education of children at the state and local level.  Funding for government education has increased billions of dollars under President Bush.
*    His support of Clinton’s 1995 “assault weapons ban” which outlawed a host of semi-automatic guns.  The gun ban was due to expire in 2005, but according to Presidential spokesman Scott McClellan, “The president supports the current law (the Clinton gun ban), and he supports reauthorization of the current law.”
46, 47
*    His approval of federally-financed experimentation on human embryos.48
*    His support of Clinton’s National Monuments Declaration, in which millions of acres of western land were seized by the executive branch.
49, 50
*    His dramatic increase in the size and spending of the federal government with a record deficit.  With his $2.23 trillion budget, his administration will complete the biggest increase in government spending since Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society.”  The budget deficit predicted by the House Budget Office will hit a record $306 billion.  Spending on government programs increased 22 % from 1999 to 2003.  A Washington Post report said, “The era of big government, if it ever went away, has returned full-throttle under President Bush.”  Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey commented that under President Bush, the federal government is “out of control.” 51
*    Not only did President Bush publicly condemn Judge Roy Moore’s actions52, his chief political consultant Karl Rove spearheaded the attack against him.53   When Roy Moore was before Bill Pryor’s inquisition, about to lose his job for his public stand for God, President Bush was in California campaigning for a pro-abortion, pro-homosexual Republican, Arnold Schwarzenegger.
*    His expansion of government welfare programs to illegal aliens and his proposals to grant amnesty to illegal aliens.
54, 54, 56   President Bush has demonstrated dangerous negligence in restoring security to our borders.
*    His proposal to increase the budget and the power of the Internal Revenue Service: “Bush would give the IRS a 5.3 percent boost to $10.4 billion for the budget year that begins Oct. 1.  That will include $133 million dollars for added audits of businesses and high-income taxpayers.”
*    His increased funding of the National Endowment of the Arts, which uses taxpayer money to publicize vulgar and blasphemous “art,” such as the artwork depicting a crucifix in a jar of urine.
59, 60
*    His endorsement and promotion of the globalist, sovereignty-threatening aims of the United Nations.61, 62  He has continued the Clintonian policy of sending our soldiers to serve under U.N. commanders on U.N. missions.
*    He signed into law a massive expansion of Medicare that, according to Ron Paul (R-Texas), resulted in “the single largest expansion of the federal welfare state since the Great Society programs of the 1960s.”
63, 64
*    In spite of the fact that he campaigned on the promise to veto any campaign finance reform legislation that limited Americans’ freedom of speech, he signed into law the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Bill that effectively eviscerated the first amendment.65, 66
*    With the so-called Patriot Act and the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003, his remedy for terrorism has been an ever-growing police state.67  These pieces of legislation read like KGB manuals of an all-powerful Leninist state – Janet Reno could only dream of serving under such a President!  The government can bug and search citizens and their private records without court oversight and without suspicion of a crime; they can lock you up indefinitely without a formal charge; they can deny you an attorney and a jury of your peers, etc.   Our leaders have exploited a tragedy to retire as the servants of the citizens and attempt to usurp constitutional limitations to become our masters. G.W. Bush is pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, he’s anti-gun, and he’s the biggest spender in American history.  American conservatives have taken the bait at the expense of their cause and God’s glory.Rebuttal: (One I heard many times in the year preceding the 2000 elections.)

“A vote for Howard Phillips,” (the only pro-life, pro-family constitutional Presidential candidate on the ballot 2000) “is a vote for Al Gore.” 

If you are shortsighted, pragmatism will dictate that you vote for the least wicked man who will do the least amount of wickedness and destroy the least amount of your freedoms these next four years.  I have a good friend who can’t stand President Bush’s pro-abortion or pro-homosexual leanings or his big-government remedy for every social ill, but he voted for Bush in 2000 anyway because the one thing he feared more than Bush was Gore.  But if you vote for the lesser of two evils every four years, the lesser of two evils will inevitably become more and more wicked!  If you vote for the most conservative of two liberals every four years, the most conservative liberal will become more and more liberal!  Your vision must be greater than the next four years.  You need to vote with your grandchildren in mind.  

If you always vote for the most conservative of two liberal candidates, then America will always be justifying the murder of preborn children.  Always!  In 2020, maybe the lesser of two evils is a pro-abortion homosexual who will charge you only 80% for taxes while the greater of two evils is a pro-abortion communist who charges 95%.  Do you see what I am saying?  There must be some issues on which conservatives will not compromise, and the legal killing of children is one of those issues. 

I am going to vote to keep my conscience clean first and foremost.  That means I’m going to vote for the best man for the job and pray in faith (not in unbelief) for a miracle.  If more saints did the same, we WILL see our miracle.69   I am praying, “God give us godly leaders who will outlaw abortion and govern us in accordance with the laws of nature and nature’s God.”  How can I pray this prayer and not act in accordance?  Should I pray in unbelief (as evidenced by my vote on Nov.7)?  Or should I pray in faith, and act in accordance to my prayers?Voting for Bush over Gore was not “the lesser of two evils,” as it has often been said.  It was more evil!  When the liberal President Bill Clinton tried to shove his socialistic, liberal nonsense down the nation’s throat, conservatives in Congress and around the nation fought him every step of the way.70   How can so many of those conservatives live with themselves as they support and vote with President Bush as he does the very same thing they so vigorously opposed with Bill Clinton?  It appears that conservatives have unconditional allegiance for their darling, “Christian” President, regardless of how many babies he kills, how many militant homosexual he appoints, how much of our hard-money he steals and spends on nonsense to which we would not donate voluntarily, how many of our constitutional liberties he rescinds with his anti-terrorism legislation, and how successful he has been in four years at doing what Clinton was unable to do in eight!  As Alan Keyes admitted when George W. Bush was chosen to be the Republican nominee, Bush is more dangerous than Clinton!  Voting the lesser of two evils is only reasonable when it truly is lesser; but with the Republican Party’s capitulation to Bush’s liberal agenda, Bush accomplished much more for the left than Clinton ever dreamed! I would be remiss to mention that many Christian Bush-supporters are not ignorant or naive about the President’s liberal tendencies.  They hate government-sanctioned child-killing and the homosexual agenda and they are aware of Bush’s grave shortcomings in these areas, but they believe that promoting godliness in government is a matter of “incrementalism” — a gradual shifting of policies and legislation to the right.  The conservative “incrementalists” condemn my approach as an “all-or-nothing” mentality that is doomed to obscurity and failure.  I have two comments about the philosophy of incrementalism when it comes to President Bush.  First, if Bush is “incrementally” taking us anywhere, it’s to the left.  The same goes with the Republican party as a whole: they are “incrementally” taking conservativism to the left — we are not taking them to the right.  Under G.W. Bush and a Republican-dominated Congress and Senate, there are more babies dying at the expense of the taxpayers, there are more homosexual proponents of gay marriage being elevated to positions of government leadership, the central government is getting larger and Constitutional rights are being undermined even more than under Clinton.  Conservatives have been betrayed by Bush’s rhetoric, and have not judged him by his fruit. Second, I freely admit that political incrementalism has its place.  I am not at all against it.  But there comes a time when Christians, constrained by conscience, must draw a line in the sand and say, “No!  I’m not going to compromise anymore!”  If we can compromise to support a Presidential or Congressional candidate who supports the killing of innocent preborn children in some instances, then what won’t we compromise on?  Would we compromise to support a candidate that supported the killing of Jews, or the elderly and infirmed?  Would we compromise to support the “incremental” abolition of kidnapping and enslaving blacks?  Would we compromise to support a candidate that supported the killing of Christians?  I don’t think we would compromise to support a “conservative” candidate who endorsed the killing of us, and if not, do we love our neighbor as ourselves if we compromise to support a candidate who endorses the killing of our preborn neighbors?  I fear for the professing Christians who compromise to vote for a President whom they know justifies abortion and who doesn’t want Roe v. Wade to be overturned.  Will they look down at their hands on Judgment Day to see them stained with innocent blood?  Will they hear, “Inasmuch as ye did it not to the least of these, ye did it not to me”? (Matthew 25:45)Conclusion:

In George W. Bush, the church has elected a government leader after its own image.  Our government and society have descended headlong into the sewage of immorality because the church has.  Homosexuals and pro-abortion activists fill our government offices because they fill our pews and choir lofts.  We have largely ceased to be the salt of the United States of America, and Jesus promised that we’ll be cast out and trodden under the boot heels of wicked men.71   Judgment must first begin in the House of God.  Suffering and tyranny will be our lot if we persist in our lukewarmness.  There are many more September 11’s coming, America.  The II Chronicles 7:14 remedy for national forgiveness and healing includes that we “turn from (our) wicked ways.”  If the American church doesn’t repent for tolerating sin and leaving our first love, then the Lord will remove our candlestick.72  However, if we repent of our tolerance of sin and judge ourselves, if we put impenitent sinners out of the church as I Corinthians 5 instructs, the Lord promises that we will not be judged.  If we pray in faith for godly leaders and act in accordance, then the Lord, who sets up and tears down kings, might restore the Republic.  The future of our nation and our liberties depends on our obedience to His law and will. 

In 1995, James Dobson of Focus on the Family publicly repented on air and in his March newsletter for having supported somewhat pro-choice politicians.  “Perhaps this explains the statement I made on the radio last month, which some of you questioned.  Let me express it once more,” wrote Dobson.  “I am committed never again to cast a vote for a politician who would kill one innocent baby…  Never will I use my influence, however remotely, to support the shedding of their blood.”   After the election, James Dobson admitted that he voted for Howard Phillips, the Constitution Party’s Candidate for President.  

It’s time that Christians make the same vow: never again will we use our influence or our vote or a single red cent to encourage one drop of innocent bloodshed.  We will draw a line in the sand far enough to the right that no pro-abortion fanatics, homosexual activistss, or God-haters can win our allegiance.  Like Gideon’s Army, the Lord may dwindle us down to a zealous few before the victorious battle, but it will be a few out of whom God can get some glory. 

As for me and my house, we will support and vote for a Presidential candidate that is pro-life without exceptions, who will not capitulate to the militant homosexuals, and who will constrain themselves to the Constitution upon which our nation was founded. 

Dr. Johnston practices family medicine in Zanesville, Ohio
, and is Vice Chairman of the Constitutional Party of Ohio. His ministry is Where the Truth Hurts.

Email Dr. Johnston

Send this Article to a Friend


1. “Bush Abortion Comments Spark Debate”, Pro-Life Infonet, 3-22-99,
 2. Joseph Kellard, “George W. Bush’s Contradictory Stand on Abortion”, Capitalism Magazine, 9-22-99,
 3. “Bush Tempers Abortion Remarks,” New York Times, 10-1-00
 4. Alan Keyes on Greenspan at Large (CNN), 8-9-01, Renew America Archives, R
 5. Judy Keen et al, “Bush: USA Isn’t Ready for Total Abortion Ban,” USA Today, 10-28-03,
 6. J.P. Johnston, “The Line in the Sand: Siding with God to Abolish Abortion”,
 7. “Bush, McCain Step Around Abortion”, The Associated Press, 1-27-00
 8. Washington Post, 6-15-99
 9. The New York Times, 7-9-00
 10. “Bush Reinstates Pro-Life Mexico City Policy,” Pro-Life Infonet, 1-22-01,
 11. Richard Stevenson, “Bush Eases Ban on AIDS Money to Pro-Abortion Groups Abroad,” New York Times, 2-15-03,
 12. Edwin Chen, “Bush alters stance on AIDS funding restrictions: Turnabout on policy affects overseas service agencies,” Los Angeles Times, 2-16-03,
 13. William Jasper, “The Global AIDS Con Game,” The New American, 6-2-03,
 14. J. Johnston, “The Partial Birth Abortion Ban is a Farce,” Ohio Constitution Party Website,
 15. Jim Rudd, “Partial Birth Abortion Ban of No Effect,” Covenant News, 11-26-03,
 16. Joe Giganti, “Government Funding and Abortion Income Help Planned Parenthood Make a Killing, According to Organization’s Annual Report”, U.S. Newswire,
 17. “President Bush’s Interview with Diane Sawyer”, Log Cabin Republicans of Washington, 12-17-03,
 18. “CWA Warns: Presidential Embrace of Civil Unions Undermines Pro-Family Effort to Save Marriage,” Concerned Women for America – Media, 12-17-03,
 19. Allie Martin, “Bush’s Comments Regarding Homosexual Leaders Rankle Pro-Family Leaders,” Agape Press, 12-18-03,
 20. “Confronting the Pride Divide,” The Village Voice, 9-7-99.
 21. Susan Feeney, “Bush’s Openly Gay Appointments Bother Conservatives”, The Dallas Morning News,
 22. Republican National Coalition for Life, 4-24-00
 23. “President Bush Expands AIDS Policy Team,” Log Cabin Republicans, 7-18-02,, also
 24. “Post-Election 2000,” Log Cabin Republicans,
 25. “Post-Election 2000,” Log Cabin Republicans,
 26. “Post-Election 2000,” Log Cabin Republicans,
 27. “U.S. Rep Jim Kolbe to Address Republican National Convention,” PR Newswire, 8-1-00,
 28. “Bush Asks Homosexual Congressman to Speak,”World Net Daily, 8-1-00,
 29. “President Bush Appoints New Members to HIV/AIDS Advisory Council,” Log Cabin Republicans, 1-25-02,
 30., 7-25-02
 31 “Freedom Means Freedom for Everybody,” Independent Gay Forum, 10-19-00,
 32. Mike Allen, “Law Extends Benefits to Same Sex Couples,” Washington Post, 6-26-02,
 33. “Bush Advances Gay Agenda,” Family Policy Network,
 34. “Post-Election 2000,” Log Cabin Republicans,
 35. Richard Goldstein, “Bush’s Gay Gambit,” The Village Voice, 7-17-02,,  also
 36. “Bush Cheers ‘Gay’ Church After ‘Marriage Week’,” World Net Daily, 11-12-03,
 37. Robert Knight, “Anatomy of a Smear: How ‘Gay’ Activists, the Media and the White House Shredded Jerry Thacker,” Concerned Women for America, Culture and Family Institute, 2- 6-03,
 38. “Bush: Christianity Central to His Life”, Religion Today, 1-26-00
 39. John 7:24
 40. “Denouncing The President Bush’s Shinto Shrine Worship”, Christian Council of Korea, Korea Evangelical Fellowship, Christian Ethics Movement of Korea,, also and
 41. “Bush: Christians, Muslims Worship the Same God,” Maranatha Christian Journal, 11-21-03,
 42. I John 2:22-23, John 14:6,
 43. “Bush Honors Islam Holy Month”, U.S. Dept. of State website, Nov.19, 2001,
 44. M. Kilian, “Bush Approves 15 Percent Budget Increase for NEA,” Monterey Herald, Jan.29, 2004,
 45. Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives website,
 46. Shannon McCaffrey, “Bush Supports New Extension of Assault Weapon Ban,” The Salt Lake Tribune, 4-12-03,
 47. “Bush Supports Assault Weapon/Mag Ban,” Neal Knox News, 4-17-03,
 48. “Bush Policy Forces Taxpayers Into Cooperation With Killing Embryos,” Republican National Committee for Life Report, Sept./Oct. 2001,
 49. “Clinton’s Latest Landgrab: One Million Acres,”, 1-18-01,
 50. “Monumental Effort,” Headwaters News, 2-13-02,
 51. “Spending Growth Upsets Conservatives,” The Washington Times, 6-30-03,
 52. “Disputed U.S. Monument Removed,” One News, Aug. 28, 2003,,1227,216568-1-9,00.html
 53. Chuck Baldwin, “Is President Bush Really One of Us?” 10-25-03,
 54. William Jasper, “Bush’s Coming Amnesty Plan”, The New American, Jan.12, 2004,
 55. Mike Allen, “Immigration Reform on Bush Agenda,” Washington Post, 12-24-03,
 56. William Jasper, “Bush’s Coming Amnesty Plan,” The New American, 1-12-04,
 57. William N. Grigg, “Rewarding Lawlessness,” The New American, 11-3-3,
 58. Chuck Baldwin, “Bush: Biggest Spender Ever!” 2-4-03,
 59. “FY 2004 Funding for the National Endowment of the Arts,” Association of Performing Arts Presenters,
 60.  Almanac of Policy Issues,
 61. “Whose ‘Word’ Was Given?” The John Birch Society, 11-30-03,
 62. “United Nations,” The John Birch Society,
 63. “Prescription Drug Subsidies and the Gangster State,” The New American, 12-29-03,
 64. John Goodman, “Why the Medicare Reform Bill is Bad Legislation,” Health Care News, 1-1-04,
 65. “Bush Signs Campaign Finance Reform Law,” Fox News, 3-27-02,,2933,48907,00.html
 66. Jeff Johnson, “Bush Signs Campaign Finance Bill, Lawsuits Filed,” CNS News, 3-27-02,
 67. “Trading Freedom From Security,” 5-5-03, and “The Un-American Patriot Act,” 1-14-02, The New American,
 68. “The USA PATRIOT Act,” Electronic Privacy Information Center,
 69. James 1:5-8, Mark 11:22-24
 70. “The Anybody Other Than Bush’ Test,” The John Birch Society website, 12-14-03,
 71. Matthew 5:13
 72. Revelation 2-3
 73. James Dobson, Focus on the Family Newsletter, March 1995,
 74 “To Bolt or Not to Bolt: A Perennial Question for Purists,” Public Eye Magazine, Spring 2001,

Posted in abortion, America, Christianity, church corruption, George Bush, Israel, James Dobson, jerry falwell, politics, prophecy, Ron Paul, spiritual deception | Comments Off on Why Christians Should Not Support George W. Bush

Character issues apply to GOP, too – Mike Huckabee

Posted by soldierservant on June 10, 2007

Posted in George Bush, Mike Huckabee | Comments Off on Character issues apply to GOP, too – Mike Huckabee